The accused was charged with assaulting his common law partner causing bodily harm, and assaulting and threatening his child.
The trial involved conflicting evidence, including testimony and videotaped statements from two child witnesses, and testimony from the accused.
The court applied the W.(D.) framework to assess credibility.
The court rejected the accused's testimony and relied on the videotaped statement of one child, corroborated by circumstantial evidence including photographs of injuries and the victim's unresponsiveness.
The accused was found guilty of assault causing bodily harm against his partner, but acquitted of the charges relating to the child.