The union filed unfair labour practice complaints alleging that the College violated the College's Collective Bargaining Act by cancelling extension courses taught by full-time faculty during a legal strike, and by refusing to allow a specific faculty member to teach in the subsequent semester due to his union activities.
The Board found that the College's decisions to replace or cancel the suspended courses were made for bona fide operational reasons to minimize disruption, and were not tainted by anti-union animus.
The Board also concluded that the refusal to hire the specific faculty member was based on his unprofessional conduct and low course enrolment, rather than his union involvement.
The complaints were dismissed.
