The Plaintiffs brought a motion seeking a certificate of pending litigation (CPL) on a property, asserting a 30% ownership interest based on a trust agreement and an investment for a property flip.
The Defendants opposed the CPL, arguing the funds were for safekeeping, and brought a cross-motion to dismiss the CPL, allow payment of $75,000 into court, and delete a caution on title.
The court found a triable issue regarding the Plaintiffs' interest but dismissed the CPL motion, concluding that damages would be a satisfactory remedy as the property was not unique and the investment's purpose was profit.
The court ordered the Defendants to pay $75,000 into court following the property's sale but declined to order the immediate deletion of the caution on title.