The appellants appealed the dismissal of their claim for business interruption losses following a fire at their towing and collision repair facility.
They argued the trial judge's reasons were inadequate and misapprehended the evidence regarding the impact of the fire and subsequent arson rumours on their business.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that while the trial judge's reasons standing alone made appellate review difficult, the basis for her rejection of the appellants' evidence and expert report was patent on the record.
