The self-represented applicant named the 'Toronto Police Service' as the respondent.
The respondents failed to file a substantive response, arguing that the named entity was a nullity, despite previous Tribunal rulings that the Toronto Police Services Board and/or the Chief of Police must respond in such circumstances.
The Tribunal amended the style of cause on its own initiative and ordered the respondents to file a substantive response on the merits, expressing concern over their failure to follow clear Tribunal directions.
