The appellant appealed a License Appeal Tribunal decision directing the Registrar to revoke his appointment as a bailiff for allegedly participating in unlawful entries.
The Divisional Court allowed the appeal, finding that the Tribunal's conclusion regarding the first incident was unreasonable because the evidence established the client had a right to occupy the premises.
The Court further held it was administratively unfair to rely on a second, much older incident as an independent basis for revocation due to delay and prejudice.
The Tribunal's decision was set aside.
