The respondents requested a reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that found them liable for discrimination based on sex and creed, and reprisal.
The respondents argued that they were denied natural justice when their adjournment request was refused, and that the Tribunal erred in its findings of fact and damage awards.
The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the decisions regarding the adjournment and amendments were not final decisions subject to reconsideration.
Furthermore, the Tribunal held that the respondents were merely attempting to re-argue issues already decided without presenting new evidence or showing a conflict with established jurisprudence.