The appellant appealed an arbitrator's decision denying her claim for weekly income benefits and refusing to award her arbitration expenses.
The arbitrator found that the appellant had deliberately withheld information from her doctors about a previous back injury.
On appeal, the appellant argued that under the McCormick principles, she should be awarded expenses because her claim was not found to be frivolous or vexatious, nor did her conduct unreasonably prolong the proceedings.
The Director's Delegate dismissed the appeal, holding that the arbitrator's discretion to deny expenses was exercised reasonably given the appellant's deliberate misrepresentation of her pre-accident health, which went to the heart of her evidence.