The accused was charged with sexual assault and sexual interference following an encounter with his then-boyfriend.
The complainant alleged that the accused engaged in non-consensual sexual acts, while the accused maintained that all activity was consensual.
The court applied the W.D. framework to assess credibility, finding the complainant's evidence inconsistent, exaggerated, and contradicted by external evidence, including a post-incident selfie and testimony from a witness present in the apartment.
The court believed the accused's evidence, found that the complainant consented, and acquitted the accused on both counts.
