The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of family status and reprisal.
The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer because grievances had been filed addressing the same incidents.
The respondent supported deferral, noting the grievances would soon proceed to arbitration.
The applicant opposed deferral, arguing the grievances were closed and the issues were different.
The Tribunal found that the facts and issues in the grievance arbitration appeared to be the same as those in the application, and deferred the application to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent findings.
