Aida Abraha

The applicant in a human rights proceeding alleging discrimination based on disability, sex, race, and reprisal brought a Request for Order seeking further production of documents from the respondent employer.

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to produce redacted medical and accommodation records of a male comparator who was allegedly granted a work-from-home accommodation, as well as the results of a search for home-based accommodations and the applicant's performance reviews.

The Tribunal denied requests for broader statistical data and internal reports, finding them overly broad and of little probative value to the specific allegations.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in her volunteer work based on disability, age, and reprisal.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application should be dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal dismissed the allegations relating to a November 2010 ban from the respondent's premises due to delay, finding no good faith reason for the late filing.

However, the Tribunal allowed the allegation regarding a June 2013 ban from a volunteer tent to proceed, as the applicant might establish a link to her disability.

Several individual and organizational respondents were removed from the application due to a lack of supporting facts.