The appellants appealed an order finding they acted oppressively toward the respondent, a 10% minority shareholder in a landlord corporation, by leasing property to their own company at below-market rent.
The Divisional Court upheld the finding of oppression regarding the failure to pay fair market rent after the initial lease term expired in 2010.
However, the court set aside the application judge's finding that the respondent reasonably expected triple rent for overholding, and reversed remedial orders directed at a non-party tenant corporation and for the period prior to 2010, finding that cash payments made to the respondent's principal had alleviated any unfair prejudice during that time.