The appellant appealed a decision enforcing a settlement between the parties.
He argued the motion judge erred by ignoring an alleged fraud against a third party, a payment issue, and the respondent's early departure from the home.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding the motion judge correctly exercised her discretion, properly credited the appellant for payments made, and correctly interpreted the settlement terms regarding the home.
The court also found the motion judge's reasons were adequate.
