The applicant challenged the validity of her late father's will, which excluded her as a beneficiary, alleging lack of testamentary capacity, undue influence, suspicious circumstances, and lack of knowledge and approval.
The testator had been diagnosed with dementia and mild cognitive impairment prior to executing the will.
The court found that suspicious circumstances existed, shifting the burden to the propounder of the will.
However, the court concluded that the testator had testamentary capacity, knew and approved of the will's contents, and was not subjected to undue influence, noting he provided clear and rational reasons to his drafting lawyer for excluding the applicant.
The application was dismissed and the will was declared valid.