The applicant father brought a motion for a temporary shared parenting plan on a 2-2-3 schedule for the parties' two young children.
The respondent mother opposed the motion, seeking to maintain a schedule with no overnight parenting time, relying on uncorroborated allegations of family violence.
The court found that the father had historically shared parenting responsibilities and that the mother's unilateral termination of overnight access was not justified by the evidence.
The court granted the motion, ordering a phased-in 2-2-3 shared parenting schedule and shared decision-making.
