The plaintiff, claiming to represent the Kinakwii Nation, sought to stop the enforcement of a mortgage by Farm Credit Canada by asserting Indigenous rights over the mortgaged land.
The defendants sought to dismiss the action as frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of process under Rule 2.1.
The plaintiff requested an urgent case conference to schedule a motion to adjourn the upcoming Rule 2.1 review and summary judgment motion, citing the need to examine the Chief Justice of Canada and the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada.
The court refused to schedule the motion, noting that Rule 2.1 reviews are not evidentiary hearings and that the plaintiff's tactics resembled 'freeman on the land' arguments.
The court stayed the plaintiff's proposed motion pending a Rule 2.1.02 review.
