The moving party sought to terminate or reduce his spousal support obligations, arguing that the responding party had achieved economic self-sufficiency due to an increase in her employment income.
The court found that the responding party's increased income constituted a material change in circumstances.
However, considering the compensatory nature of the original support order and the economic hardship the responding party suffered from the marriage breakdown, the court declined to terminate support.
Instead, the court reduced the monthly spousal support amount retroactively and prospectively based on the parties' updated incomes.