The applicant, sought for extradition to the United States on a charge of murder for hire, applied for an order for additional disclosure relating to the examination of his seized iPhone by Canadian police.
The applicant argued that the Second Revised Record of the Case (SRROC) lacked sufficient information to determine whether the search warrant was validly issued and executed in compliance with the Charter.
The court dismissed the application, finding that the applicant failed to meet the threshold for additional disclosure in extradition proceedings, as the SRROC contained sufficient information to plausibly infer that the evidence was obtained lawfully and the applicant's request amounted to a fishing expedition.
