The applicant husband requested an addendum to the trial judgment to include an inadvertently omitted divorce order and to reduce the amount of life insurance required to secure child support.
The court granted the divorce order.
Applying Katz v. Katz, the court also agreed that the original $1 million life insurance requirement could result in a windfall, as it exceeded the aggregate child support obligation.
The court amended the order, reducing the required life insurance to $400,000, with a further reduction to $100,000 when one of the children turns 16.
