The accused was charged with multiple aggravated assaults involving a hammer.
Police officers recognized the accused from a police broadcast containing video and still photos of a suspect.
The officers detained the accused for investigative purposes and, after confirming his identity against the broadcast photos, arrested him.
The accused challenged the legality of the arrest, arguing the officers lacked reasonable and probable grounds.
The court found the officers had both subjective and objective grounds to arrest the accused, acting in good faith based on the broadcast and their observations.
The arrest was ruled lawful.
