The appellant, Seyar Khairzad, appealed a Superior Court order that dismissed his motion to change a consent decision-making and parenting time order and increased his child support.
He also sought leave to adduce fresh evidence.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no material error in the motion judge's decision regarding decision-making responsibility or parenting time, noting the history of domestic violence and communication issues.
The court upheld the imputed income for child support due to the appellant's non-compliance with disclosure orders.
The motion for fresh evidence was also dismissed, as the evidence was either available at the original hearing or would not have affected the outcome.
Costs were awarded to the respondent.