The appellants appealed a trial judgment that found the respondent was a 25% shareholder in the family cartage business and had been oppressed.
The trial judge had ordered the appellants to buy out the respondent's interest at fair market value without a minority discount.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding that the trial judge's findings of fact were reasonable, the remedy showed no error in principle, and the costs award was a proper exercise of judicial discretion.
