The appellant appealed his conviction and six-month sentence for accessing child pornography.
He argued the trial judge erred in dismissing his section 8 Charter challenge regarding the search warrant, claiming the information was stale and the warrant overbroad.
He also argued the verdict was unreasonable and that the Crown failed to prove jurisdiction.
The Superior Court of Justice dismissed the conviction appeal, finding the trial judge's inferences were reasonable and the verdict was supported by the circumstantial evidence.
The sentence appeal was also dismissed, as the six-month sentence was not manifestly unfit and the trial judge properly considered mitigating and aggravating factors.
