In this family property appeal arising from a fact-driven trial, the appellant challenged the trial judge’s findings, particularly concerning ownership of a triplex, and alleged reasonable apprehension of bias.
The court held that the factual findings were amply supported by the record and disclosed no palpable or overriding error.
It also rejected the bias allegation and dismissed the contingent cross-appeal, including the claim for pre-judgment interest.
A motion to admit fresh evidence was also dismissed, and appeal costs were fixed in favour of the respondent.
