The applicant wife brought a motion for temporary child and spousal support, interim disbursements, preservation orders, and to add the husband's father and his new company as parties.
The wife alleged the husband was hiding assets and intentionally bankrupting their previously successful business to avoid support obligations.
The husband claimed he and his business were insolvent.
The court found the husband's financial evidence suspicious and his conduct concerning, noting he paid creditors instead of supporting his family.
The court ordered $7,500 monthly in unallocated support, granted leave to add the father and his company as parties, and ordered various financial disclosures and preservation measures, but declined to impute an $800,000 income or order interim disbursements at this stage.
