The applicant wife brought a motion for interim spousal support, and the respondent husband brought a cross-motion for interim child support.
The wife claimed she was unable to work due to medical conditions, while the husband argued she was employed by her new partner's law firm.
The court dismissed the wife's motion, finding she failed to establish a prima facie case for entitlement on either compensatory or non-compensatory grounds, largely due to insufficient medical evidence and failure to make proper financial disclosure.
The court also dismissed the husband's motion for child support, declining to impute income to the wife at the interim stage given the conflicting affidavit evidence.
