The plaintiff, a director of a commercial cannabis business, brought a motion in an oppression remedy proceeding to nullify shareholder resolutions that removed him as a director and appointed a new sole director.
The court found that the resolution removing the plaintiff violated the Business Corporations Act because he was not given notice or an opportunity to submit a written statement opposing his removal.
The court ordered the plaintiff reinstated as a director but dismissed the request for an injunction against the newly appointed director, finding the test for injunctive relief was not met.
