The applicant mother sought an interim order permitting her to relocate with the parties' 5-year-old daughter from Sarnia to Aurora for employment purposes.
The respondent father opposed the relocation and sought shared parenting time and joint decision-making responsibility.
The court found that the mother had met the burden of proving the relocation was in the child's best interests, noting the financial benefit to the family unit and the mother's inability to find suitable employment in Sarnia.
The court granted the interim relocation, awarded the mother decision-making responsibility for education and extracurricular activities, ordered joint decision-making for health and religion, and set out a parenting schedule for the father.