The accused was charged with sexual assault, sexual interference, and sexual exploitation involving repeated sexual acts against his granddaughter between approximately ages five and eleven.
The court applied the credibility framework in R. v. W. (D.) and assessed competing testimony from the complainant, the accused, and other family members.
The defence advanced theories of fabrication, lack of opportunity, mistaken identity, and motives related to family disputes and cultural issues.
The court rejected the accused’s evidence and found the complainant’s detailed and consistent testimony credible and reliable, including explanations for delayed disclosure and continued family contact.
The Crown proved the offences beyond a reasonable doubt.
