Cross-motions in a family law matter concerning parenting time and therapeutic reunification.
The mother sought to suspend an existing access order pending a future motion date, while the father sought an order appointing a specific professional to conduct reintegration or reunification therapy between him and the children.
The court declined to suspend the existing access order and emphasized the urgency of commencing reintegration therapy.
Given the parties’ lack of mutual trust in the proposed experts, the court directed the two proposed professionals to consult and jointly recommend a neutral third professional to undertake the therapy.
The matter was scheduled to return before the court for an update on the selected professional.
