The plaintiff brought a motion for leave to issue a certificate of pending litigation (CPL) over a Toronto condominium legally owned by his ex-fiancée, the defendant.
The plaintiff claimed beneficial ownership based on an oral agreement and wire transfers he alleged were for the property's purchase.
The court found the plaintiff established a triable issue for a constructive trust.
However, the court dismissed the motion, concluding that the equities favoured the defendant because the property was an investment, not unique to the plaintiff, and damages would be an adequate remedy.
Costs were awarded to the defendant.