The defendant insurer brought a motion to compel the plaintiff to answer undertakings given during examinations for discovery.
The plaintiff brought a cross-motion seeking production of the police investigation file related to an arson charge against her that was later withdrawn.
The court ordered the defendant to produce the police file and its investigator's file, as they were relevant to the plaintiff's claim for punitive damages.
The court also ordered the plaintiff to answer undertakings regarding the sale price of her home and the name of a doctor who treated her for a brain injury, but found other requested information irrelevant.
Costs of $3,000 were awarded to the plaintiff.
