The moving party sought to vary a spousal support order following a catastrophic stroke that significantly reduced his income.
The responding party opposed termination of support, asserting inability to work due to fibromyalgia and ongoing financial need.
The court found a material change in circumstances under s. 17(4.1) of the Divorce Act due to the payor’s permanent disability and reduced income.
The court rejected the recipient’s claim of unemployability due to insufficient medical evidence and imputed minimum-wage income, and also drew adverse inferences regarding financial need because the recipient was cohabiting with a new partner without providing financial disclosure.
Spousal support was reduced substantially and structured to decline in stages rather than terminated.