The applicant mother and respondent father brought urgent cross-motions regarding parenting arrangements for their four-year-old daughter.
The child had resided primarily with the mother since separation.
The father unilaterally removed the child from school, prompting the mother to seek an emergency order.
The court found that the father's actions and history of family violence raised serious concerns about his judgment.
The court maintained the status quo, granting the mother interim sole decision-making authority and primary residence, while awarding the father unsupervised parenting time on alternate weekends and mid-week overnights.
The court also strongly condemned the practice of parents video-recording access exchanges.
