Ashley Lennox v. De Boer Tool and Eugenie Amoranto, 2016 HRTO 379

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Ashley Lennox

Applicant

-and-

De Boer Tool and Eugenie Amoranto

Respondents

DECISION

Adjudicator: Genevieve Debane

Date: March 23, 2016

Citation: 2016 HRTO 379

Indexed as: Lennox v. De Boer Tool

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”).

2On December 4, 2015 the Tribunal issued a Notice of Mediation to the parties confirming that mediation of the Application would take place on January 5, 2016. The Notice was mailed to the applicant’s address at the address provided in the Application and was not returned as undeliverable.

3The applicant did not attend the scheduled mediation session and did not communicate with the Tribunal to explain the failure to attend.

4On January 6, 2016 the Tribunal wrote the applicant directing that the applicant advise it of her intentions with respect to the Application. The letter warned the applicant that a failure to respond to the letter in writing by January 18, 2016 might be deemed an abandonment of the Application.

5As of the date of this Decision the applicant has not responded to the Tribunal and the Tribunal’s correspondence to the applicant has not been returned.

6In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application and the Application is dismissed.