Laura Fry v. Lakeridge Health, 2016 HRTO 1285

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Laura Fry

Applicant

-and-

Lakeridge Health

Respondents

DECISION

Adjudicator: Keith Brennenstuhl

Date: October 4, 2016

Citation: 2016 HRTO 1285

Indexed as: Fry v. Lakeridge Health

1This is an Application under the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended. The Application is scheduled to be heard on October 28, 2016.

2On June 21, 2016, the Tribunal sent the parties a Notice of Hearing directing them to take certain steps in advance of the hearing. In particular, and among other things, the Notice of Hearing directed the parties to comply with Rules 16 and 17 of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure by providing one another with copies of their arguably relevant documents within 21 days of the date of the Notice of Hearing; and by exchanging with one another and filing with the Tribunal the documents they intended to rely upon at the hearing, a list of their witnesses and a summary of their witnesses’ anticipated evidence by no later than September 13, 2016 (i.e. 45 days before the first scheduled day of hearing).

3The applicant has not provided the Tribunal with the materials required under Rules 16 and 17 of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure by September 13, 2016.

4Accordingly, in a September 21, 2016 Case Assessment Direction (“CAD”), the Tribunal directed the applicant to provide the required materials to the respondents and the Tribunal by no later than September 30, 2016.

5In its CAD, the Tribunal warned the applicant that there were serious consequences for the case if she did not comply with the Tribunal’s directions. In particular, the Tribunal’s CAD contained the following directions to the applicant:

By no later than September 30, 2016, the applicant must deliver to the respondent and file with the Tribunal: (1) the documents she intends to rely upon at the hearing, (2) a list of her witnesses and (3) a brief statement describing what his witnesses will say when they testify.

The applicant is reminded that she must also submit a witness statement for herself, assuming she intends to testify at the hearing. However, if the applicant only intends to testify about the facts already contained in her Application (and Reply, if any), it is sufficient for her to confirm this in writing by September 30, 2016.

If the applicant has not complied with these directions by September 30, 2016, or communicated with the Tribunal at all, the Application may be dismissed as abandoned.

6It is now past the applicant’s deadline for complying with the Tribunal’s directions and the applicant has not filed the required materials with the Tribunal, nor has she communicated with the Tribunal.

7In the circumstances, it appears that the applicant has abandoned the Application. Accordingly, the Application is dismissed as abandoned.

ORDER

8The Application is dismissed as abandoned and the October 28, 2016 hearing date is cancelled.