Christina Crispino v. Longos Brothers Fruit Markets Inc., 2015 HRTO 91

Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

B E T W E E N:

Christina Crispino

Applicant

-and-

Longos Brothers Fruit Markets Inc.

Respondent

DECISION

Adjudicator: Brian Eyolfson

Date: January 21, 2015

Citation: 2015 HRTO 91

Indexed as: Crispino v. Longos Brothers Fruit Markets Inc.

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on September 25, 2014.

2On October 29, 2014, the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s jurisdiction. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than December 1, 2014. The NOID advised the applicant that a failure to respond to the NOID by the required time may be considered an abandonment of the Application and the Application might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed. The NOID was delivered to the applicant in care of her alternative contact at the address provided for her alternative contact in the Application and has not been returned as undeliverable.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.