Richard Maisonneuve v. Kevin Serviss, 2015 HRTO 260

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Richard Maisonneuve

Applicant

-and-

Kevin Serviss

Respondent

DECISION

Adjudicator: Dawn J. Kershaw

Date: March 4, 2015

Citation: 2015 HRTO 260

Indexed as: Maisonneuve v. Serviss

Introduction

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on December 5, 2014.

2On January 6, 2015 the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than February 5, 2015. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.