Milonas v. Bank of Montreal, 2015 HRTO 1502

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

James Milonas

Applicant

-and-

Bank of Montreal

Respondent

DECISION

Adjudicator: David Muir

Date: November 6, 2015

Citation: 2015 HRTO 1502

Indexed as: Milonas v. Bank of Montreal

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on June 10 , 2015.

2On September 22, 2015, the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) because it appeared that the Application may be outside of the Tribunal’s jurisdiction to decide. The NOID was sent by regular mail to the applicant’s representative and was not returned to the Tribunal.

3The applicant was directed to provide his written submissions in response to the NOID before October 22, 2015. The applicant was further advised that if he did not provide written submissions by the required time, the Tribunal may make its decision based only on the information in the Application or may consider the failure to respond as an abandonment of the Application and dismiss it for that reason.

4The applicant did not respond to the NOID and the time for doing so has passed. The applicant has not otherwise communicated with the Tribunal.

5In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application. The Application is dismissed.