The applicant brought two human rights applications alleging discrimination and reprisal. In this interim decision, the Tribunal addressed several procedural issues. The Tribunal dismissed the applicant's request for the adjudicator to recuse himself for bias, finding no reasonable apprehension of bias. The Tribunal denied requests to consolidate the proceeding with a previously dismissed application or to defer it pending a Supreme Court leave application. The Tribunal struck several paragraphs from the reprisal application as irrelevant, dismissed a 2011 reprisal allegation for delay, and permitted the applicant to amend her first application to add reprisal to certain existing allegations while denying amendments that sought to revive dismissed claims.
B E T W E E N:
Haruyo Taucar
Applicant
-and-
The University of Western Ontario, Donna Pennee and Lisa Ann Korab
Respondents
A N D B E T W E E N:
Haruyo Taucar
Applicant
-and-
Western University
Respondent
INTERIM DECISION
Adjudicator: Mark Hart
Date: January 28, 2015
Citation: 2015 HRTO 125
Indexed as: Taucar v.