Behrooz Palangi v. RBC Royal Bank of Canada, 2015 HRTO 108

Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

B E T W E E N:

Behrooz Palangi

Applicant

-and-

RBC Royal Bank of Canada

Respondent

DECISION

Adjudicator: Brian Eyolfson
Date: January 23, 2015
Citation: 2015 HRTO 108
Indexed as: Palangi v. RBC Royal Bank of Canada

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on October 14, 2014.

2On October 17, 2014 the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than November 16, 2014. The NOID advised the applicant that a failure to respond to the NOID by the required time may be considered an abandonment of the Application and the Application might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed. The NOID was delivered to the applicant by both regular mail and email at addresses provided by the applicant in the Application and has not been returned as undeliverable.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.