Maria Rots v. Fido Mobile, 2014 HRTO 710

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Maria Rots

Applicant

-and-

Fido Mobile

Respondent

DECISION

Adjudicator: Dawn J. Kershaw
Date: May 20, 2014
Citation: 2014 HRTO 710
Indexed as: Rots v. Fido Mobile

Introduction

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on November 13, 2013.

2On March 14, 2014, the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than April 14, 2014. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.