HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO
B E T W E E N:
Deepinder Loomba
Applicant
-and-
Reilly Security Services
Respondent
DECISION
Adjudicator: Sheri D. Price
Indexed as: Loomba v. Reilly Security Services
1This is an Application filed under s.34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended.
2On November 28, 2013, the Tribunal sent the applicant a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application on the basis of delay, pursuant to s.34(1) of the Code. The Notice directed the applicant to provide written submissions on the delay issue by January 10, 2014, failing which the Tribunal would make a decision on the delay issue based only on the information in his Application, or alternatively consider the failure to respond as an abandonment of the Application and dismiss it accordingly.
3On January 2, 2014, the applicant sought an extension of time for the filing of his written submissions on the delay issue. This was granted, to January 27, 2014. However, the extended deadline for submissions has now passed and the applicant has not responded to the Notice of Intent to Dismiss or made any submissions explaining why his Application should not be dismissed as untimely.
4Accordingly, the Application is hereby dismissed as abandoned.
Dated at Toronto, this 10th day of March, 2014.
“Signed by”
Sheri D. Price
Vice-chair