Erika Schneider v. Extendicare Falconbridge, 2014 HRTO 1426

Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

BETWEEN:

Erika Schneider Applicant

-and-

Extendicare Falconbridge Respondent

DECISION

Adjudicator: Brian Eyolfson Date: September 24, 2014 Citation: 2014 HRTO 1426 Indexed as: Schneider v. Extendicare Falconbridge

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on May 9, 2014.

2On June 27, 2014 the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than July 27, 2014. The NOID advised the applicant that a failure to respond to the NOID by the required time may be considered an abandonment of the Application and the Application might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed. The NOID was delivered to the applicant by email at the address provided by the applicant in the Application and has not been returned as undeliverable.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.