Robert Lyden v. Metal Koting (Continuous Colour Coat Limited), 2014 HRTO 1054

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Robert Lyden

Applicant

-and-

Metal Koting (Continuous Colour Coat Limited); Jason Compton; Mark Hendron, Valarie Faria and Jan Negrini

Respondents

DECISION

Adjudicator: David Muir

Date: July 18, 2014

Citation: 2014 HRTO 1054

Indexed as: Lyden v. Metal Koting (Continuous Colour Coat Limited)

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on May 14, 2014.

2On June 11, 2014 the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) because it appeared that the Applicant may be outside of the Tribunal’s jurisdiction to decide. The applicant was directed to provide his written submissions in response to the NOID before July 11, 2014. The applicant was further advised that he did not provide written submissions by the required time the Tribunal may make its decision based only on the information in the Application or may consider the failure to respond as an abandonment of the Application and dismiss it for that reason.

3The applicant did not respond to the NOID and the time for doing so passed.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.