HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO
B E T W E E N:
Raymond MacKinnon
Applicant
-and-
Celtech Plastics Ltd. and Nahum Williams
Respondents
DECISION ON REMEDY
Adjudicator: Judith Keene
Indexed as: MacKinnon v. Celtech Plastics Ltd.
APPEARANCES
Raymond MacKinnon, Applicant
Self-represented
Introduction
1This is a decision with respect to remedy in an Application filed on June 30, 2010, under section 34 of Part IV of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), alleging discrimination with respect to employment because of age.
2My decision as to the merits was issued on in this Application was issued on December 20, 2012, and the facts of the matter are set out in that decision (2012 HRTO 2372). I concluded that the applicant had established a breach of s. 5 of the Code and issued an Order containing a monetary remedy for violation of his inherent right to be free from discrimination, and for injury to his dignity.
3I indicated at paragraph 24 of the above-noted Decision that I did not have enough evidence to be sufficiently clear about the connection of wage/employment benefits loss to the breach of the Code that has been established. The Order stated:
If the applicant wishes to bring evidence to establish his entitlement to an order for compensation for wage/benefits loss, the applicant must contact the Registrar within thirty days of the date of this Decision so that a further conference call may be scheduled. I will remain seized on the question of compensation for wage/benefits loss.
4As of this date, the applicant has not contacted the Tribunal to give further evidence in response to the paragraph set out above. Accordingly, I will make no order in respect of compensation for wage/benefits loss in this matter.
Dated at Toronto, this 16th day of April, 2013.
“Signed by”
Judith Keene
Vice-chair