Michele Zigman-Peebles v. The Corporation of the City of Kingston, 2013 HRTO 2036

Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario

B E T W E E N:

Michele Zigman-Peebles Applicant

-and-

The Corporation of the City of Kingston Respondent

DECISION

Adjudicator: David Muir Date: December 6, 2013 Citation: 2013 HRTO 2036 Indexed as: Zigman-Peebles v. Kingston (City)

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on August 13, 2013.

2On October 2, 2013 the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than November 1, 2013. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.