HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO
B E T W E E N:
Sarah Rogers
Applicant
-and-
Holcim (Canada) Inc.
Respondent
DECISION
Adjudicator: David Muir
Indexed as: Rogers v. Holcim (Canada) Inc.
1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on October 14, 2010.
2In Interim Decision 2011 HRTO 867 issued on May 2, 2011, the Tribunal deferred proceeding with this Application pending the conclusion of ongoing claim un the Employment Standards Act.
3On October 24, 2012 the Tribunal wrote to the applicant and respondent. The applicant was asked to inform the Registrar in writing within 30 days of the date of the letter whether the other proceedings remained ongoing and, if possible, to indicate when they were expected to be completed. The letter went on to warn the applicant that failure to provide the requested information might result in the Tribunal dismissing the Application as abandoned.
4The applicant did not respond to the Tribunal’s October 24 2012 letter. The Tribunal’s letter to the applicant has not been returned as undeliverable. On May 16, 2013, the Tribunal wrote to the applicant again, providing a copy of the October 24, 2012 letter and directing her to respond within five days of this Direction. The applicant has not responded to this correspondence nor communicated with the Tribunal in any way.
5In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application and the Application is dismissed.
Dated at Toronto, this 4th day of October, 2013.
“Signed by”
David Muir
Vice-chair