Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario
B E T W E E N:
William Halliday
Applicant
-and-
Van Toen Innovations Incorporated
Respondent
DECISION
Adjudicator: Geneviève Debané
Date: September 24, 2013
Citation: 2013 HRTO 1606
Indexed as: Halliday v. Van Toen Innovations Incorporated
1Application 2012-11501-I was filed under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), alleging that a reprisal occurred on May 5, 2011.
2The applicant had previously filed Application 2010-07214-I alleging discrimination in employment. In Interim Decision 2012 HRTO 1046, issued on May 25, 2013, the Tribunal granted the applicant’s request to amend Application 2010-07214-I to include the May 5, 2011 reprisal allegation.
3On April 9, 2013 the Tribunal issued Decision 2013 HRTO 583 (the “Decision”) which amongst other things dealt with the May 5, 2011 allegation of reprisal.
4On August 29, 2013, the Tribunal wrote to the applicant and asked him to clarify his intention to proceed with Application 2012-11501-I, within 14 days. No submissions were received from the applicant.
DECISION
5Having reviewed this matter I am satisfied that the reprisal allegations in Application 2012-11501-I were dealt with in the Decision. In these circumstances and in the absence of any submissions from the applicant I find that it is appropriate to dismiss Application 2012-11501-I.
Dated at Toronto, this 24th day of September, 2013.
“Signed by”
Geneviève Debané
Vice-chair