Sylvain Chartier v. Allard Interior Systems Inc., 2013 HRTO 146

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Sylvain Chartier

Applicant

-and-

Allard Interior Systems Inc.

Respondent

INTERIM DECISION

Adjudicator: Brian Eyolfson Date: January 29, 2013 Citation: 2013 HRTO 146 Indexed as: Chartier v. Allard Interior Systems Inc.

1The applicant filed this Application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on August 7, 2012.

2On September 7, 2012 the Tribunal issued a Notice of Application to the respondent in which it directed that a Response to the Application must be filed with the Tribunal not later than October 12, 2012. As no Response was received from the respondent by this deadline, the Tribunal issued a decision on October 25, 2012, 2012 HRTO 2037, advising the respondent that it had failed to respond and warning it of the consequences of such a failure.

3After this decision was issued, the Notice of Application was returned to the Tribunal as undelivered due to an administrative error in the mailing address. On November 27, 2012 the Tribunal issued an amended Notice of Application to the respondent in which it directed that a Response to the Application must be filed with the Tribunal not later than January 9, 2013. As of the date of this Interim Decision the respondent has not filed a Response, nor has the Tribunal’s November 27, 2012 correspondence to it been returned.

4An application to the Tribunal starts a legal proceeding. A finding that a violation of the Code has occurred may lead to various orders, including monetary compensation, other forms of restitution to the applicant, and orders to take action to promote compliance with the Code. Failure to file a response or participate in a Tribunal proceeding may lead to orders against individual and corporate respondents without their participation. The respondent's attention is drawn to Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure which reads as follows:

5.5 Where an Application is delivered to a Respondent who does not respond to the Application, the Tribunal may:

a) deem the Respondent to have accepted all of the allegations in the Application;

b) proceed to deal with the Application without further notice to the Respondent;

c) deem the Respondent to have waived all rights with respect to further notice or participation in the proceeding;

d) decide the matter based only on the material before the Tribunal.

5The applicant has provided a mailing address and an email address for the respondent. The Tribunal shall send a copy of this Interim Decision to the respondent by regular mail and email.

6If the respondent wishes to participate in this proceeding, it shall file a Response with the Tribunal within 14 days of the date of this Interim Decision, together with an explanation of why the Response was not filed in accordance with the amended Notice of Application. If a Response is not received, the Tribunal may proceed without further notice to the respondent and may take any or all of the steps set out in Rule 5.5.

7I am not seized of this matter.